tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8860387354345137184.post6874084729738101353..comments2023-11-03T05:50:18.057-04:00Comments on Libertas and Latte: Your daily dose of crazy.....Constitutional Insurgenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03251746798758539951noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8860387354345137184.post-74945700152911765452010-10-22T08:50:39.351-04:002010-10-22T08:50:39.351-04:00You're correct...when I was a Republican, I mu...You're correct...when I was a Republican, I must have missed the seminar on how to utterly convolute language.<br /><br />I understand where she thought she was going with this line, but she wasn't adept enough to realize that was easily outmaneuvered, or when the crowd.....and even the moderator was incredulous.Constitutional Insurgenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03251746798758539951noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8860387354345137184.post-77809088515776840352010-10-21T13:24:14.723-04:002010-10-21T13:24:14.723-04:00You don't know Republicanspeak. I knew what sh...You don't know Republicanspeak. I knew what she thought she was doing before she explained herself. Meaning, if it's not found in the constitution as stated/phrased today, the issue belongs to the state. By that reasoning, she believes she's perfectly right, <i>and coming from a strict interpretation</i>, she is correct: states can establish (and I assume sanction) religion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com