Wednesday, January 20, 2010 defined by the media

The Republican candidate in Massachusetts won an election against a mediocre Democrat who took her victory for a state that is no stranger to electing Republicans to the states highest offices...during an opposition-majority incumbency in two of the branches of government. To cite this as a harbinger of some political hurricane is science fiction.

True Independents are a viable force, but a force that has not yet been reckoned with in the US. American politics are media driven and the Senate race in Massachusetts is a prime example. The media in nearly every case intermixes and confuses undecided voters with actual Independents.....and added to the mix are decidedly partisan voters who find it vogue to label themselves as Independents when their party of conscience has been roundly and soundly lambasted as hypocritical and dangerous. True Independents are not evenly acknowledged by the media...a media that really only recognizes and thus caters to the two major parties. It's ratings built on Us v. Them.

Some Independent power can be noted by the farcical 'tea party' movement. I've seen plenty of Independent and Libertarian friends get sucked in by the propaganda of the 'third way'. It takes a bit of an intervention to make them see that the tea party is a Republican funded and directed movement dressed in different clothes. Many people will espouse smaller government and individual liberty yet continue to vote in statist politicians and policies that grow government and infringe on liberty. An acquaintance and I were bouncing ideas around a while back about how we could truly get a movement started that held to principles over party. Until that time comes [if it ever can] 'Independents' will be treated as either undecided Democrats or Republicans.....or used as a false flag by the triumvirate of corporate-media-politics.


  1. It takes money to run a party CI. Tea partiers sell tickets and advertising.

    True Independents by their nature abhor the influence of money in politics. Their integrity keeps them from raising money to rail against money influencing politics. In essence, they defeat themselves with their own honest nature.

  2. Oh I agree with you....somewhere there has to be a balance between principles and whoring yourself out. I don't think that balance will be struck without a paradigm shift in the nature of our government.

  3. Once there is enough pain brought upon the people by the Corpotocracy, there will be a viable and triumphant third party. Until then we just keep bending over.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.